Mr S Francis v BUKCS Ltd and others: 6019561/2025

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 6019561/2025
Mr S FrancisClaimantDid not attendRespondent
Employment Judge S EdwardsIn person for claimantNot represented for respondentDate 17 September 2025

JUDGMENT

Under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents all having failed to file a response to the claimant’s claims, the Judgment of the Tribunal is as follows:[1]The complaints against the second and third respondents are not well founded and are dismissed. Unfair Dismissal[1]The complaint of unfair dismissal is not well-founded and is dismissed. Wages[2]The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded. The first respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period 1st April 2024 to 3rd February 2025.[3]The first respondent shall pay the claimant £13,629.84, which is the gross sum deducted. The claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance. Holiday Pay[4]The complaint in respect of holiday pay is well-founded. The first respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.[5]The first respondent shall pay the claimant £3,779.78. The claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance. Approved by: