Mr D O’Connell v Armstrong Teasdale Management Ltd (In administration) and Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy: 6019035/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]The claim was presented in the London Central Employment Tribunal on 18 November 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of part of the claim, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant.[3]The claim for unfair dismissal succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.[4]It is not appropriate to make a determination at this stage of the claimant’s remaining complaints of automatic unfair dismissal (section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996), detriment following protected disclosure (section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996) or victimisation (section 27 Equality Act 2010). Employment Judge Keogh 6 May 2025