L Cheung v Ultramist T/a Ultrasafe: 6018965/2025
JUDGMENT
The claim for a redundancy payment is struck out.REASONS
[1]The claimant claims the right to a redundancy payment.[2]Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 says that employees do not have the right to a redundancy payment unless they have been employed for two years or more.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore, the claimant does not have the right to a redundancy payment.[5]The claimant was given the opportunity to explain why the claim for a redundancy payment should not be struck out but has not given an acceptable reason.[6]Accordingly, the claim for a redundancy payment is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Employment Judge Deeley Date: 25 June 2025 Case Number: 6018965/2025 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: L Cheung Respondent: Ultramist T/a Ultrasafe Heard at: by video, Leeds On: 21 July 2025 Before: Employment Judge Aspden Appearances For the claimant: no attendance For the respondent: no attendance