F A V Lopez v Quantuma: 6017869/2024
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out against all and any respondentsREASONS
[1]By a letter dated 10 January 2026, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to contact the Tribunal by 31 January 2026 to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The Claimant named Quantuma and Quantuma LLP as prospective respondent in the early conciliation certificate and in Box 2 of claim form. Quantuma LLP appears to have been dissolved. The Claimant was asked to write to the Tribunal about that (and other matters) by 5 May 2025 by the Tribunal’s letter of 28 April 2025. As mentioned in the 10 January letter, the Claimant had failed to respond to that letter.[3]The Tribunal has received emails from Quantuma Advisory Limited asserting that they believe that the intended respondent might have been Sullivan Bus & Coach Limited in Liquidation.[4]In response to the Tribunal’s 10 January 2026 correspondence, the claimant has failed to make representations in writing and has failed to ask for a hearing. More generally, he has not contacted the Tribunal at all since the claim was presented. Page 1 of 2 Case No: 6017869/2024[5]The claim is not being actively pursued, and it is proportionate to strike out. The claim is therefore struck out.[6]Any application for reconsideration must be made promptly and in accordance with normal time limits Approved by: