J Owusu-Banahene v One 100 Ltd: 6017677/2025
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because it has not been actively pursued.REASONS
[1]The claimant submitted his claim on 13 May 2025. The respondent has not submitted an ET3.The case was listed for a final hearing on 15 October 2025. Neither party attended. The claimant did notify the Tribunal that he was unable to attend or provide a reason for his non-attendance.[2]In a case management order of 15 October 2025, I indicated that I was considering striking out the claimant’s claim because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal’s orders and the claim had not been actively pursued.[3]I directed that if the claimant wished to object, he was to provide his reasons in writing to the Tribunal or request a hearing at which he could make any objections and provide his reasons. The claimant was required to comply with that direction by 13 November 2025.[4]A copy of the case management order was sent to the claimant on 10 November. The claimant has not complied with the direction. For that reason, I am satisfied that the claim is not being actively pursued and the claim should be struck out.