Mr R Rosewarne v The Traffic Management Company: 6014811/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 6014811/2024
Mr R RosewarneClaimantThe Traffic Management CompanyRespondent
Employment Judge Gumbiti-ZimutoDate 2 July 2025

JUDGMENT

[1]The claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 11 October 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £620.00 gross.[3]The claimant must write to the Tribunal within 14 days of the date on which this judgement is sent to the parties if the claimant is seeking to a claim in respect of out of pocket expenses, specifying the amount and how the expenses have come to be incurred. Approved by:

REASONS

There is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked, because the respondent appears to want a reconsideration of the judgment made where rule 22 applies, while the respondent has stated that it did not receive the claim it has failed to provide a draft response to the claim. Unless a properly completed draft ET3 for is accompanied by an application to set aside the rule 22 judgment is made the judgment remains in place and may potentially be enforced against the respondent. Approved by: