Mr S H Sultana v Sasa Super Foods Ltd: 6013195/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]The respondent has failed to file ET 3 grounds of resistance in this case.[2]Having considered the ET1 and having heard from the claimant, the judgement of the Tribunal, made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 is as follows:a. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is wellfounded. The respondent shall pay the claimant £3180.32, which is the gross sum deducted. The claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance.b. The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is wellfounded. The respondent shall pay the claimant £430.35 as damages for breach of contract. This figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant will have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.c. The complaint in respect of holiday pay is well-founded. The respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The respondent shall pay the claimant £503.31. The claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance. Case Number: 6013195/2024d. The respondent failed to give the claimant written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 in the period May and June 2024.