Ms A McIver v Mr H Stean and Howard Stean Aesthetic Dentistry: 6012486/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]No party attended or was represented at today’s final hearing.[2]Having considered the information available to it, following further enquiries made by the Tribunal clerk this morning, the Tribunal exercises its power to dismiss the Claimant’s claim in Case No: 6012486/2024 under Rule 47 of the ET Rules of Procedure (party’s non-attendance/non-representation at a hearing).[3]For the avoidance of doubt, the decision above has no bearing on the Claimant’s separate claim in Case No: 6022108/2024. NOTE[4]Reasons for the decision above were given orally at the hearing, but in brief, the Tribunal understands the claim has settled. Any request for written reasons must be made within 2 weeks of receipt of this Judgment (taken to be the date this Judgment is recorded as having been sent to the party). In default of a timely request for written reasons, written reasons will be provided only at the request of the Employment Appeal Tribunal or a competent court.[5]A copy of this judgment will be published online after it has been sent to the parties. Approved by: