Mr I Langham v Norfolk County Council: 6012287/2025
JUDGMENT
[1]The following claims were not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. The following claims are therefore dismissed:a. Notice payb. Holiday pay; andc. Unlawful deduction from wages.[2]The complaint of sex discrimination was not presented within the applicable time limit. It is not just and equitable to extend the time limit. The claim is therefore dismissed.[3]The claimant complains of unfair dismissal. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years. Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring these proceedings. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. Accordingly, the claim is struck out.[4]The claimant claims the right to a redundancy payment. Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 says that employees do not have the right to a redundancy payment unless they have been employed for two years or more. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years. Therefore, the claimant does not have the right to a redundancy payment. The claimant was given the opportunity to explain why the complaint the complaint should not be struck out but has not given an acceptable reason. Accordingly, the claim is struck out. Approved by: