Ms D Beresford v Sunflower Spalding Cash and Carry Ltd (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation): 6009011/2025
JUDGMENT
UPON hearing from the claimant in person UPON the respondent not attending and indicating that it would not attend, would not defend the case but did not concede the claimant was unfairly dismissed UPON considering the evidence presented by the claimant UPON the respondent not filing any evidence in support of its response and therefore failing to prove a potentially fair reason for dismissal AND UPON concluding that the respondent had significantly failed to follow Acas Code of Practice Number 1 such that it was just and equitable to uplift any compensatory award by 20% IT IS THE TRIBUNAL’S JUDGMENT THAT[1]The respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant[2]The respondent must pay to the claimant a basic award of £15,400[3]The respondent must pay to the claimant a compensatory award of £15,987.05 calculated as 3.1. For loss of statutory rights the sum of £500, and 3.2. For loss of earnings £15,487.05. Page 1 of 2 Case No 6009011/2025[4]The respondent must pay to the claimant an additional amount of £3,197.41, being a 20% uplift to reflect the failure to comply with a relevant Acas Code of Practice. Approved by: Employment Judge Adkinson Dated: 25 September 2025 ...05 November 2025...... For the Employment Tribunal .............................................. Notes Reasons for the judgment or order having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.