Mr J Grzegorzewicz v New Kitchen Parkstone Ltd: 6006064/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 6006064/2024
Mr J GrzegorzewiczClaimantNew Kitchen Parkstone LtdRespondent
Employment Judge YallopIn person for claimantNot represented for respondentDate 25 July 2025

JUDGMENT

The Respondent failed to enter a valid response to the claim, and a hearing was listed to determine liability and remedy. The judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: Wages[1]The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded. The Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages in the period 28 May 2024 to 3 July 2024.[2]The Respondent shall pay the Claimant £561, which is the gross sum deducted. The Claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance.[3]This sum has been calculated as follows:  12 shifts x 5.5 hours x £13 = £858 wages owed for delivery driving.  13 x £13 = £169 wages owed for refurbishing the kitchen.  £858 + £169 = £1,027.  The Respondent paid the Claimant £466.  £1,027£466 = £561. Mileage[4]The complaint of breach of contract in relation to mileage expenses is wellfounded.[5]The Respondent shall pay the Claimant £270 as damages for breach of contract. This figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant will have to pay tax on it. Notice Pay[6]The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is well-founded.[7]The Respondent shall pay the Claimant £143 as damages for breach of contract. This figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant will have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.[8]This figure has been calculated as follows:  The Claimant was entitled to receive 1 week’s notice.  His average weekly income during his employment was 2 x 5.5 x £13 = £143. Holiday Pay[9]The complaint in respect of holiday pay is well-founded. The Respondent failed to pay the Claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.[10]The Respondent shall pay the Claimant £95.81. The Claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance.[11]This sum has been calculated as follows:  The Claimant was entitled to receive 5.6 weeks' leave a year.  The Claimant worked for the Respondent for 6 weeks out of 52, so for 12% of the year.  5.6 divided by 100 x 12 = 0.67. He therefore accrued 0.67 weeks' of leave.  He didn't take any leave during his employment.  He was therefore entitled to be paid for 0.67 weeks' leave at his weekly pay of £143. 143 x 0.67 = £95.81. Written Itemised Pay Statements[12]The Respondent failed to give the Claimant written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 in the period 28 May 2024 to 3 July 2024. Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars[13]When the proceedings were begun the Respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. It is just and equitable to make an award of an amount equal to four weeks’ gross pay. In accordance with section 38 Employment Act 2002 the Respondent shall therefore pay the Claimant £572.[14]This sum has been calculated as follows:  143 x 4 = £572.