Mr D Stanfield v Collpay Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) and Lumocolor Ltd: 6005347/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 6005347/2024
Mr D StanfieldClaimantCollpay Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) and Lumocolor LtdRespondent
Employment Judge Phil AllenMr R Ross (instructed by counsel) for claimantNot represented for respondentDate 7 October 2025

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024– Rule 22 The judgment of the Tribunal is that:[1]The Tribunal does have jurisdiction to determine the claimant’s claims against the second respondent.[2]The second respondent failed to comply with Regulations 13 and 14 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.[3]The claimant is awarded appropriate compensation of 13 weeks gross pay. The second respondent must pay the claimant £35,000.[4]The second respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and is ordered to pay him the gross sum of £1,714.13.[5]The second respondent breached the claimant’s contract of employment by dismissing him without notice. The second respondent is ordered to pay the claimant damages in the sum of £25,000 (the damages having been capped at the maximum amount which the Tribunal is able to award).[6]The claims against the first respondent are stayed for six months (until 7 April 2025).