S Gurung v SKH Beauty Ltd T/a SKH London: 6004950/2024
JUDGMENT
UNDER RULE 21 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL RULES OF PROCEDURE 2013[1]The Respondent has failed to file an ET3 within the deadline and has not requested an extension of time to file the same.[2]The correct name of the Respondent is SKH Beauty Ltd, trading as SKH London.[3]Having considered the ET1 and documents provided by the Claimant, Employment Judge Brown has decided that a determination of the claim can properly be made without a hearing and the Judgment of the Tribunal, made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, is as set out below.[4]The Respondent has unlawfully failed to pay the Claimant’s wages in the sum of £1,315.80.[5]Accordingly, the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £1,315.80, and to account to HMRC for any tax and NI due on this sum.