Miss A Nicholls v Stow Residential Ltd and Others: 6004081/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]The claim is struck out pursuant to rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, because:a. The claimant did not object to the proposal to strike out her claim as set out in the order of 6 February 2025. The reasons for the strike out warning were: i. In respect of the claim of unfair dismissal the claimant did not have two years’ service as required by section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996; ii. In respect of all claims:(1) the claimant did not comply with the orders dated 6 August 2024; and(2) the claimant (who failed to attend the 6 February 2025 hearing) did not appear to be actively pursuing her claim.b. The claimant has not complied with the orders of the Tribunal dated 6 February 2025.c. The claimant failed to attend the hearing of 30 April 2025, despite being notified of the hearing by the Tribunal. This was her second failure to attend a preliminary hearing or apply for a postponement.