Mrs P Gumus v Edge Hill University: 6004031/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]It was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to submit her claims of whistleblowing detriment within the primary time limit. Therefore, the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to consider these complaints. Had the complaints been submitted in time, they would not be upheld in any event. Therefore, the complaints of whistleblowing detriment are not well founded and are dismissed.[2]The complaint of constructive dismissal is not well founded and is dismissed.[3]The complaint of automatically unfair dismissal under s.103A Employment Rights Act is not well founded and is dismissed. Case No. 6004031/2024