E Chivers v Leading Property Consultancy Ltd: 6003087/2025
JUDGMENT
[1]The respondent’s email application yesterday to extend time for presentation of the response is refused. Reasons: no good reason was provided for the respondent, a company, failing to present its response on time having received the claim. The claimant referred to his autism, for which adjustments were made today, but the company is a separate entity with limited liability and there was no explanation for its failure in those circumstances. The grounds of resistance are misconceived. The interests of justice are not served by extending time in this case.[2]There is sufficient information on the file for me to give a Rule 22 Judgment as follows: The claimant’s complaint for unpaid holiday pay on the termination of employment succeeds and the respondent shall pay to her the net sum of £430.38.[3]This judgment is to be sent to the parties on the Tribunal’s file but additionally emailed to: louise@leadingpropertyco.com and dain@leadingpropertyco.com. Case Number:6003087/2025