Ms S McKee v Applegreen (Petrogas): 6002518/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]The claim is dismissed.REASONS
[2]Neither party attended the hearing. The clerk attempted unsuccessfully to contact the claimant by telephone at 14.10.[3]There has been no contact from the claimant since the claim form was filed. Although the respondent has not responded to the claim, the respondent named on the claim form is not a legal entity. The claimant did not comply with an order dated 15 August 2024 to confirm the correct name of her employer.[4]It is not possible to issue a rule 21 judgment because(i) the respondent is not a legal entity(ii) the claim is out of time and(iii) the claimant has not provided details of the amounts claimed. The claim cannot be re-served on the claimant’s employer because the claimant has not complied with the order of 15 August 2024.[5]In the circumstances I determined that it was in accordance with the overriding objective and in the interests of justice to dismiss the claim under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. Case No: 6002518/2024[6]If the claimant has a good reason for failing to attend the hearing, she may apply for a reconsideration of this judgment under rule 70 within 14 days of the date that this judgment was sent to the parties.