[1]The claims of direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability and harassment related to disability detailed at issue 4.2.6.3 (and as repeated under other heads of claim) relating to the conduct of Mr David Gray are dismissed on their withdrawal by the Claimant.[2]The remaining claims of direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability and harassment related to disability are not well founded and are dismissed.[3]The claims of direct sex discrimination are not well founded and are dismissed.[4]The claim of unfair dismissal is not well founded and is dismissed. Had it been necessary to determine reductions for contributory fault or Polkey reductions, each would have been made at 100%.[5]Had it been necessary to determine whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine whether it had jurisdiction to hear the claims, the Tribunal would have found that all claims (save for unfair dismissal) were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time.[6]It was unnecessary to determine whether the impairment caused by any mental health condition constituted a disability within the definition of section 6 and schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010. No finding to that effect was made. Case No: 6002213/2024 Approved by