N Daman v Made In Thailand Ltd: 6001899/2024
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 23 April 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. _____________________________ Employment Judge Hutchinson Date: 28 July 2024 Case No 6001899/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms N Daman Respondent: Made in Thailand Ltd Heard at: Leicester Hearing Centre, 5a New Walk, Leicester, LE1 6TE By video link On: 13 September 2024 Before: Employment Judge Adkinson sitting alone Appearances For the claimant: Mr Okiki, lay representative For the respondent: *Barred from taking part*[1]The respondent has failed to pay to the claimant her holiday pay. The respondent must therefore pay to the claimant £1,001 gross.[2]The respondent has failed to pay to the claimant her 2 weeks’ notice pay, and therefore must pay to her £462 gross[3]The respondent has unfairly dismissed the claimant and therefore must pay the following 3.1. As a basic award, the sum of £462; 3.2. As a compensatory award of £9,717 calculated as follows 3.2.1. For loss of statutory rights the sum of £350; Page 1 of 2 Case No 6001899/2024 3.2.2. For loss of earnings following dismissal, the sum of £7,392; 3.2.3. For expenses incurred seeking new employment, the sum of £35. 3.2.4. For failure to follow the Acas Code of Practice on dismissals, by way as an uplift, the sum of £1,940. For the purposes of the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996, the required information is as follows: Prescribed element [PE]: £7,392; Prescribed period (inclusive) : 31 January 2024 and 13 September 2024; Total awarded [TA]: £11,642; Balance [TA]-[PE]: £4,250.