Miss E Hughes v Hood Salons Ltd: 4112033/2019
JUDGMENT
Hood Salons Ltd The claim is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1 )(d).REASONS
1 . A continued hearing was scheduled for 1 April 2020 by telephone conference call. The claimant did not participate. The clerk attempted to telephone the claimant but the telephone number on record did not connect.[2]Employment Judge McMahon directed that the clerk send an email to the claimant asking that she contact the tribunal’s office by 15 April 2020 stating whether she wished to continue with the claim. No reply was received.[3]On 9 June 2020 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 23 June 2020 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out.[4]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim.