Miss E Yule v Lakemere Global Holdings Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) and AGO Outsourcing: 4111920/2019
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d)REASONS
[1]The Tribunal wrote to the claimant, by email, on 29 November 2019 asking her to identify which of the two respondents employed her at the time of termination of employment.[2]There was no reply to that letter and the Tribunal wrote again on 7 January 2020 asking for a reply by 22 January 2020. That letter was again sent by email.[3]There was no reply to that letter and the Tribunal wrote again on 28 January 2020 to advise that a Judge was considering striking out the claim as it was not being actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to disagree with that action by 12 February 2020 or to request a hearing.[4]Nothing has been received. Therefore the claim is struck out. Employment Judge: Susan Walker Date of Judgement: 26 February 2020 Entered in register: 26 February 2020 And copied to parties EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111920/2019 Employment Judge S Walker Miss E Yule Claimant Ago Outsourcing First Respondent[1]The Tribunal wrote to the claimant, by email, on 29 November 2019 asking her to identify which of the two respondents employed her at the time of termination of employment.[2]There was no reply to that letter and the Tribunal wrote again on 7 January 2020 asking for a reply by 22 January 2020. That letter was again sent by email.[3]There was no reply to that letter and the Tribunal wrote again on 28 January 2020 to advise that a Judge was considering striking out the claim as it was not being actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to disagree with that action by 12 February 2020 or to request a hearing.[4]Nothing has been received. Therefore the claim is struck out.