G Quinn v So Eco Ltd: 4107270/2023
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under the provisions of rule 37 (1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the grounds that it has not been actively pursued.REASONS
[1]On 19 January 2024 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant asking for further specification of the claims being made in light of the respondent’s failure to lodge an ET3 response form and inviting comments on their lack of qualifying service to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal. No reply was received from the claimant.[2]On 08 February 2024 the Tribunal issued a reminder to the claimant to reply to the earlier correspondence. No reply was received from the claimant.[3]On 25 July 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 08 August 2024 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out. No reply was received from the claimant.[4]The claim is therefore struck out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.