Miss H Allen v Psymplicity Ltd (In Administration): 4107159/2023
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).REASONS
[1]By letter dated 18 January 2024 the claimant was asked to obtain permission from the respondent’s administrator or the court for her claim to proceed. The case was sisted for 6 months to allow the claimant time to obtain the necessary permission.[2]By letter dated 25 July 2024, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant for an update with a reply by date of 8 August 2024, no reply was received.[3]By letter dated 14 August 2024 a reminder was issued to the claimant with a reply date of 21 August 2024, no reply was received.[4]By letter dated 22 August 2024 a further reminder was issued to the claimant with a reply date of 29 August 2024, no reply was received.[5]By letter dated 30 August 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 14 September 2024 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out, no reply was received.[6]The claimant has failed to give reasons why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim. P O’Donnell