Mrs M Yuan v Wangping Travel Ltd: 4105460/2020

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)
Case No 4105460/2020
Mrs Mengqi YuanClaimantWangping Travel LimitedRespondent
Employment Judge B BeyzadeMr Yang Liu for respondentDirector for respondentDate 16 September 2021

JUDGMENT

[1]The judgment of the Tribunal is that: 1.1. the claimant’s complaints were lodged within the time limit set out in section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. 1.2. the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of arrears of pay between 19 March 2020 and 06 July 2020 is well - founded and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of TWO THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-THREE POUNDS AND TWENTY PENCE [£2883.20] (gross) from which tax and national insurance requires to be deducted, provided that the respondent intimates any such deductions in writing to the claimant and remits the sum deducted to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. 1.3. the complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay that was payable to the claimant is well -founded and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND SIXTY POUNDS [£1360.00] (gross) from which tax and national insurance requires to be deducted, provided that the respondent intimates any such deductions in writing to the claimant and remits the sum deducted to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. 1.4. The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment in the sum of FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVENTY POUNDS AND SEVENTY-SIX PENCE [£470.76]. 1.5. the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay between 19 March 2020 and 06 August 2020 is well - founded and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of THREE HUNDRED AND THREE POUNDS AND FIFTY-FIVE PENCE [£303.55] (gross) from which tax and national insurance requires to be deducted, provided that the respondent intimates any such deductions in writing to the claimant and remits the sum deducted to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. 1.6. The complaint of compensation pursuant to section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is not well founded and is dismissed.

REASONS

[1]Oral reasons were given for this judgment at the end of the hearing held via Cloud Video Platform (‘CVP’) hearing.