Mr B Rasoul v The London Clinic: 4105456/2020
JUDGMENT
Case No: 4105456/2020REASONS
Judge M Robison in Schedule Respondent Claimant 2013 on the 1 of the At a preliminary hearing held by telephone conference call on 6 January 2021 , In their ET3 response, lodged on 24 February 2021 , Gist Limited stated that they did not employ the claimant. The position of Gist Limited was that the At an open preliminary hearing held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on 1 June the claimant to provide any further information to enable successful service of the The Tribunal attempted to serve the claim at 2 Craigpark, Glasgow, G31 2NA on 22 July 2021. The claim was returned to the Tribunal and marked "not On 20 August 2021, the Tribunal attempted to serve the claim again on was no longer at that address. The iast known address provided was one On 13 October 2021, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant again to inform him that service had not been possible. The claimant was asked to provide an On 17 November 2021 , the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 24 November 2021 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds of failure to The claimant did not respond and the Tribunal asked him again to provide an again on 29 the Tribunal ordered that Gist Limited, 5 Brittain Way, Eurocentral, Holytown, On 28 June 2021 , Vice President Judge Walker directed that the claim be re In July 2021, the service papers were returned to the Tribunal and marked On 22 July 2021 , the claimant was informed that the Tribunal had been unable Build Limited, The Cooper Building, 505 Great Western Road, On 6 October 2021 , the Tribunal was informed by telephone that the company 2021 , the Tribunal issued a judgment dismissing Gist Limited as a respondent instructed Motherwell, ML1 4XU be added as a respondent to the proceedings. served on the respondent at Craiglea House, Glasgow, G31 2NA. correct respondent was Community Build or The London Clinic. was warned to serve the claim upon The London Clinic. The Tribunal address for service within seven days. No reply was received. and named the London Clinic as the correct respondent. where the Tribunal had already attempted service. The claimant for service. actively pursue the claim. known at this address". "address incomplete". Glasgow, G12 8HN. address Community alternative claim. 10 11 12 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 the claim on the grounds that it has not been actively pursued. should not be made or to request a hearing. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment reply was received. November 2021 that a failure to reply could result in strike out of the claim. No 15 December 2021 14 December 2021 M Robison The Tribunal therefore strikes out