Mr S Hempstock v Freshfood Company: S/4104955/2018
JUDGMENT
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held in Glasgow on 8 August 2018 Case No: S/41 04955/201 8REASONS
represented Not present and not Respondent In person Claimant 30 25 20 10[4]Findings 3. The issues to be determined 2. S/41 04955/20 18 4.5. 4.4. 4.3. 4.2. 4.1. 3.2. 3. 1 . findings in fact: The claimant The issues to be determined did not attend and was not represented. the extent permitted by the Employment entitled to attend the hearing but that it would only be able to participate In the Notice of hearing, the Tribunal in fact employment. This sum was not paid to the claimant The sum due to the claimant sum of £143.69. employment, sums In April 201 8, the claimant received of his employment The claimant was on sick leave from 2 April 2018 until the termination question week would was unpaid. An arrangement When the claimant July 2017. The claimant whether the claimant is owed wages. whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed; of gave evidence was from 12 to 18 July 2017. £36.28, he received a payment be paid on termination commenced on 19 April 2018. £92.05 commenced and the tribunal are the following: employment and was in place whereby the wages forthat for the first week worked is £265.92. informed employment, Judge. In the event, the respondent £92.05. three payments in respect of holiday pay in the of employment. makes the following with the respondent the respondent on the termination On the first week of work the of sick pay in the termination The week in that it was relevant of his on 12 of to 30 25 20 15 10[8]Wages 7. 6. Unfair dismissal 5. Observations of the evidence S/41 04955/201 8 make payment to the claimant. entitled to payment of that sum, and the Tribunal orders the respondent to claimant has not been paid the relevant sum, being £265.92. The claimant is would remain unpaid, until the termination of his employment. However, the An arrangement was in place whereby the first week worked by the claimant cannot proceed and is dismissed. employed for a period of two years. Therefore, the claim for unfair dismissal and terminated on 19 April 2018. The claimant was not continuously The claimant confirmed that his employment commenced on 12 July 2017 Although there are exceptions to this, no such claim was presented. of not less than two years ending with the effective date of termination. dismissal an employee must have been continuously employed for a period Under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, to claim unfair respondent was £265.92. claimant confirmed that the only sum he was seeking to recover from the Tribunal accepts the evidence of the claimant. During his evidence, the The claimant was the only witness. His evidence was unchallenged. The 20 August 2018 14 August 2018 G Woolfson