Ms P Wilson v Keane Premier Healthcare Ltd: 4104762/2024
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under the provisions of rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, on the grounds that it has not been actively pursued.REASONS
[1]The claimant’s representative withdrew from acting on 18 September 2024. On 24 September 2024, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant asking if she intended to represent herself or a new legal representative. If the claimant was representing herself, the Tribunal asked for her comments on the respondent’s objections to her application to amend, and whether she agreed to a judge considered the application on papers or if she wanted a hearing.[2]On 8 October 2024, the claimant sent an email to say she was instructing another lawyer. On 10 October 2024, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant requesting a timescale by 17 October 2024, in which she expected to appoint a new legal representative. No reply was received from the claimant.[3]On 21 October 2024 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant reminding her to reply to the Tribunal’s earlier correspondence about availability for the final hearing. No reply was received from the claimant.[4]On 1 November 2024, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant further reminding her to reply to the Tribunal’s earlier correspondence. No reply was received from the claimant by the deadline or by the date of this judgment.[5]On 22 November 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 6 December 2024, or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out. No reply was received from the claimant.[6]The claim is therefore struck out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. S MacLean