Mr D Smith and Mr A Davies v IAS Electrical Ltd: 4104323/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)
Case No 4104323/2022
Mr D Smith and Mr A DaviesClaimantIAS Electrical LtdRespondent
Employment Judge J ShepherdDate 19 October 2022

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the Tribunal is as follows (oral reasons having been given at the hearing, in accordance with rule 62(2) of the Employment Rules of Procedure 2013):[1]The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages brought by the first claimant, Mr Darren Smith, was well founded and the respondent shall pay to the first claimant the sum of THREE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND TWELVE POUNDS (£3312) less any statutory deductions properly due, provided that the respondent intimates any such deductions in writing to the claimant and remits the sum deducted to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.[2]The complaint in respect of holiday pay accrued but not paid as at the termination of employment brought by the first claimant, Mr Darren Smith, was well founded and the respondent shall pay to the first claimant the sum of FOUR HUNDRED AND SIXTY POUNDS AND EIGHTY PENCE (£460.80) less any statutory deductions properly due, provided that the respondent intimates any such deductions in writing to the claimant and remits the sum deducted to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.[3]The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages brought by the second claimant, Mr Andrew Davies, was well founded and the respondent shall pay to the second claimant the sum of THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND TWO POUNDS (£3402) less any statutory deductions properly due, provided that the respondent intimates any such deductions in writing to the claimant and remits the sum deducted to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.[4]The complaint in respect of holiday pay accrued but not paid as at the termination of employment brought by the second claimant, Mr Andrew Davies, was well founded and the respondent shall pay to the first claimant the sum of FOUR HUNDRED AND SIXTY POUNDS AND EIGHTY PENCE (£460.80) less any statutory deductions properly due, provided that the respondent intimates any such deductions in writing to the claimant and remits the sum deducted to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.