Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP: 4103553/2018 and others
JUDGMENT
The claims are struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claims have not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).REASONS
[1]The claimant's solicitors having withdrawn from acting on her behalf, a letter was sent to her on 25 May 2023 on the direction of an Employment Judge asking for confirmation of her intention with regard to these claims.[2]That correspondence has been returned to the Tribunal Office indicating that the claimant no longer resides at the address provided on the ET1.[3]No steps have been taken by the claimant to advise the Tribunal of her new address. In the absence of this information the tribunal cannot communicate with the claimant. The Tribunal have been unable to give the claimant notice under rule 37(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.[4]The Tribunal assumes in these circumstances that she no longer wishes to pursue her claims, which are struck out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. Employment Judge: Frances Eccles Date of Judgment: 21 June 2023 Date sent to parties: 21 June 2023 Multiple Schedule Case Number Case Name 4103553/2018 Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP 4104606/2018 Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP 4108246/2018 Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP 4105816/2018 Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP 4103536/2018 Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP 4108040/2018 Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP 4105904/2018 Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP 4105701/2018 Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP 4108294/2018 Miss E Booth v Cordia Services LLP