Mr H McCahon v Roadbridge UK Ltd (In Administration): 4103189/2022
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under the provisions of rule 37 (1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the grounds that it has not been actively pursued.REASONS
[1]On 25 October 2023 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant’s representative seeking an update on the claim which had been sisted pending clarification of any sums received from the Insolvency Service.[2]On 01 November 2023 the claimant’s representative replied asking for a further 14 days to take instructions and provide a substantive response. Nothing further was received from the claimant’s representative.[3]Given the passage of time, on 04 September 2024 the Tribunal issued a reminder to the claimant’s representative to reply to the earlier correspondence. No reply was received from the claimant’s representative.[4]On 09 October 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant’s representative an opportunity to give written reasons by 23 October 2024 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out. No reply was received from the claimant’s representative.[5]The claim is therefore struck out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. S MacLean