Ms A M Ritchie v 21st Architecture Ltd (In Administration) c/o A Andreau: 4102121/2022
JUDGMENT
[1]Claimant Respondent The complaint of unfair dismissal, having been withdrawn by the claimant, is dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. As this decision has been made by a Legal Officer, you may apply to the Tribunal for the decision to be considered afresh by an Employment Judge. Such an application must be made within 14 days of this judgment being sent to parties. Legal Officer: D Doherty Date of Judgment: 18 October 2022 Entered in register: 19 October 2022 and copied to parties[2]EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) CaseNumber:4102121/2022 Ms A M Ritchie Claimant 21st Architecture Limited (In Respondent Administration)[4]The response is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the response has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1 )(d)REASONS
[1]On 19 July 2022 the Tribunal was notified that the respondent had entered administration. The Tribunal wrote to the administrators on 11 October 2022 asking for confirmation that they continued to defend the claim. No confirmation was provided. The Tribunal wrote to the administrator again on 19 October 2022, with a further reminder issued on 1 November 2022. No reply was received.[2]On 10 November 2022 the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to give written reasons by 24 November 2022 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the response should not be struck out.[3]The respondent has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out response. Employment Judge: M Robison Date of Judgment: 28 November 2022 Entered in register: 29 November 2022 and copied to parties EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102121/2022 Ms AM Ritchie Claimant 21st Architecture Limited (In Administration) Respondent