Mr T Roberts v Comet Food Ltd (Dissolved) and R Bowman: 4100887/2022
JUDGMENT
The claim against the 1 st named respondent, Comet Food Limited (Dissolved), is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1 )(d).REASONS
[1]On 06 July 2022 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant providing information regarding making an application to Companies House to have the 1 st named respondent restored to the Register of Companies.[2]As no correspondence had been received from the claimant since that letter was issued, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 09 June 2023 requesting an update. No reply was received from the claimant.[3]On 1 1 July 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 25 July 2023 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim against the 1 st named respondent should not be struck out. No reply was received from the claimant.[4]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim against the 1 st named respondent. Employment Judge: P O'Donnell Date of Judgment: 29 July 2023 Entered in register: 31 July 2023 and copied to parties EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100887/2022 Employment Judge L Wiseman Mr T Roberts Claimant Ryan Bowman Respondent[1]On 02 August 2023 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant seeking confirmation within 7 days as to whether the claim was still being pursued against the respondent. No reply was received from the claimant.[2]On 15 August 2023 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant reminding them to reply to our earlier letter dated 02 August 2023 within 7 days. No reply was received from the claimant.[3]On 11 September 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 25 September 2023 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out. No reply was received from the claimant.[4]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim.