Mr J Murphy v London Underground Ltd and Transport for London: 3329462/2017
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3329462/2017
Between
Mr J MurphyClaimantLondon Underground Ltd and Transport for LondonRespondent
Before
Employment Judge R LewisMs M Pennycook (instructed by counsel) for claimantMs J Shepperd (instructed by counsel) for respondentMs C Musgrave (instructed by counsel) for claimantMs J Shepherd (instructed by counsel) for respondentDate 14 December 2018
JUDGMENT
The claims against the second respondent are dismissed on withdrawal. _____________________________ Employment Judge R Lewis Date: ………………………………….. Sent to the parties on: ..27/05/2018.... ............................................................ For the Tribunal Office Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case No: 3329462/17 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr J Murphy Respondent: London Underground Limited Heard at: Watford On: 11 – 14 December 2018 Before: Employment Judge Manley Mrs AE Brown Mr S Bury Representation Claimant: Ms C Musgrave, counsel Respondent: Ms J Shepherd, counsel JUDGMENT[1]The claimant was not less favourably treated because of his age or sex. The claimant’s claims under Equality Act 2010 fail and are dismissed.[2]The conduct of the claimant was serious and amounted to gross misconduct. The respondent was entitled to summarily dismiss him and there was no breach of contract.[3]The reason for dismissal related to the claimant’s conduct. That dismissal was not unfair.