Mr D Jason v Integral Law Ltd: 3328222/2019
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. . Regional Employment Judge Foxwell _____________________________ Date: 28/09/2020 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 13/10/2020 ………………………………………………… AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER …………13/10/2020……………………………………… FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 3328222/2019 (V) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr D Jason Respondent: Integral Law Limited Heard at: Watford by CVP On: 1 April 2021 Before: Regional Employment Judge Foxwell Representation Claimant: Ms K Moss (counsel) Respondent: Mr J Gunnion (solicitor) COVID-19 Statement on behalf of Sir Keith Lindblom, Senior President of Tribunals “This has been a remote / paper hearing on the papers which has been consented to/not objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was V (remote video hearing). A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no-one requested the same, and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing / on paper]. The documents that I was referred to are in a bundle of 218 pages, the contents of which I have recorded. The order made is described at the end of these reasons.” JUDGMENT[1]The claimant has permission to amend his claim to include a claim for breach of contract as to notice; service of an amended claim and response is dispensed with.[2]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £16,886.61.[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £6,850.[4]The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the further sum of £1,050 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for its failure to provide Case No: 3328222/2019 (V) particulars of employment in accordance with Part I of the Employment Rights Act 1996.[5]The claimant’s application for costs is dismissed.