Mr C Walton v Department For Work And Pensions: 3325886/2019
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3325886/2019
Between
Mr C WaltonClaimantDepartment For Work And PensionsRespondent
Before
Employment Judge SkehanDate 21 October 2021
JUDGMENT
[1]I have considered the claimant’s request for a reconsideration sent to the employment tribunal on 5 August 2021. I apologise to the parties for the tribunal’s delay in dealing with this matter. This request was passed to me on 19 October 2021.[2]The claimant requests a reconsideration of the decision to allow him to rely upon ‘chronic anxiety and depression’ as a disability as defined within the Equality Act 2010 within this litigation. The application was supported by medical records and an impact statement that were missing at the previous preliminary hearing.[3]The respondent has helpfully reviewed the information provided by the claimant and clarified its position by email dated 2 September 2021. The respondent:3.1 concedes that the claimant’s dyslexia amounts to a disability: and3.2 should the tribunal reconsider its decision to allow the claimant to rely upon his chronic anxiety and depression, the respondent further concedes that such condition would also amount to a disability.[4]I have considered the above correspondence from the parties alongside the Employment Tribunal Rules 70-72 and conclude that a hearing is not necessary in the interests of justice. Case Number: 3325886/19[5]It is in line with the overriding objective to reconsider my previous decision and I conclude that the claimant may rely upon his condition ‘chronic anxiety and depression’ as a separate disability as defined within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 within this litigation.