Mr T Francis v DW Contractors (Oxford) Ltd: 3325202/2019
JUDGMENT
Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013[1]The Respondent has submitted its response outside the time limit allowed for such a response and without making any application for extension of time. Accordingly, it has been rejected.[2]The respondent has breached the claimant’s contract.[3]The respondent has made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages.[4]The respondent has failed to pay holiday pay due to the claimant.[5]By a separate letter the tribunal has asked the claimant to provide details of the amount of his claim so that consideration can be given to whether a judgment on remedy can be issued under rule 21 without a hearing or whether a hearing is required.[6]The parties are informed that all judgments and reasons for judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the Claimant and Respondent. ______________________ Employment Judge Anstis 15 January 2020 Sent to the parties on 03 February 2020 …………………………………….. ……………….……………...…….. for the Tribunal Office Case Number: 3325202/2019 (J) Page 1 of 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr T Francis Respondent: DW Contractors (Oxford) Limited Heard at: Reading On: 19 February 2021 Before: Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances For the Claimant: Mr A Carter, counsel For the Respondent: Mr O Lawrence, counsel