Ms M Ore v UK Atomic Energy Authority: 3323421/2021
JUDGMENT
Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013[1]The respondent failed to present a response to the claim and judgment is entered in favour of the claimant as follows.[2]The claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent.[3]The claimant was subject to unlawful sex and race discrimination by the respondent. Employment Judge Anstis 25 March 2022 Sent to the parties on ……3 April 2022…….. ………………GDJ..…….. for the Tribunal Office Case Number: 3323421/2021 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms M Ore Respondent: UK Atomic Energy AuthorityREASONS
[1]In a claim form dated the 6 December 2021 the claimant made an application to the Tribunal. The response to the claim should have been presented by the 19 January 2022. No response was presented, and a rule 21 Judgment was made on the 3 April 2022.[2]The respondent was unaware of the claim until 4 May 2022, the respondent made an application for reconsideration of the rule 21 judgment and requested an extension of time to present a response on the 10 May 2022. On the 11 May 2022 the respondent received the notice of the claim form and a copy of the rule 21 judgment.[3]The Tribunal notified the parties that the respondent’s application for reconsideration of the rule 21 judgment and an extension of time to file a response would be considered on the 9 June 2022.[4]On the 8 June 2022 the claimant wrote to the tribunal asking to withdraw the claim. The hearing on 9 June 2022 did not take place.[5]There is no objection to the respondent’s application for a reconsideration of the rule 21 Judgment.