Mr J Segal v Trend Energy Ltd: 3322936/2021
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 18 November 2021. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The Claimant was unfairly dismissed, contrary to section 99(3)(ca) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and is entitled to a basic award of £544 (being 1 week at the statutory maximum for a week’s pay).[3]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £3,250.[4]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £16,250.[5]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £5.500.[6]No sum is recoverable with respect to “ex gratia payment” and “legal costs”.