Mr R Inza v Cordant Security Ltd: 3322928/2021
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. _____________________________ Employment Judge Warren Date: 8 July 2022 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON ........22 July 2022...................................... AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER .............GDJ................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 3322928/2021 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr R Inza v Cordant Security Limited Heard at: Watford, in person On: 19 August 2022 Before: Employment Judge Hyams, sitting alone Representation: For the claimant: In person For the respondent: Not present and not represented JUDGMENT[1]The respondent unlawfully deducted the sum of £150 from the claimant’s wages and the claimant is accordingly entitled to that sum.[2]The claimant was dismissed within the meaning of section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA 1996”). That dismissal was unfair.[3]The claimant is entitled to a basic award within the meaning of section 119 of the ERA 1996 in the sum of £2,138.40 (4 x 1.5 x the claimant’s weekly wage at the time of his dismissal of £356.40).[4]The claimant is entitled to 4 week’s unpaid wages which are payable gross, i.e. before the deduction of income tax and national insurance contributions, which will be deducted from the sum under regulation 37A of the Income Tax (Pay as You Earn) Regulations 2003, SI 2003/2682. That sum is £1,425.60.[5]The claimant is owed 12 days’ accrued holiday pay, which is £855.36 gross.[6]The claimant was treated detrimentally within the meaning of section 47B of the ERA 1996 for the making of one or more protected disclosures within the meaning of section 43A of the ERA 1996. The claimant is entitled to Case Number: 3322928/2021 2 compensation in the sum of £508.00 in respect of wages paid at 50p per hour less than he would have received if he had not been treated so detrimentally. Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.