Ms D Silva Amaral v KCP Ltd: 3322400/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine all of the claimant’s complaints of discrimination as they were part of conduct extending over a period and were presented within the relevant time limit pursuant to section 123(3)(a) of the Equality Act 2010.[2]The Tribunal finds that the following complaints of pregnancy discrimination contrary to section 18 Equality Act 2010 are well founded and are upheld:(1) The complaint regarding the comments made and questions asked by Mrs K Pavelyn to the claimant on 1st May 2019 regarding the claimant’s personal and financial circumstances in the context of having a child.(2) The complaint regarding the comments made by Mrs K Pavelyn to the claimant on 21 May 2019 regarding the claimant working in a self-employed capacity and her entitlement to statutory maternity pay.(3) The complaint that the claimant’s housekeeping duties at Mrs Pavelyn’s home were withdrawn/came to an end in May 2019. 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 Case No: 3322400/2019[3]The Tribunal finds that the remaining complaints of pregnancy discrimination are not well founded and they are dismissed.[4]A further hearing will be listed to determine the appropriate remedy for the claimant. REMEDY JUDGMENT[1]The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant compensation in the total sum of £22,202.13. The judgment sum is made up of:a. £13,000 compensation for injury to feelings;b. £3,644.40 interest on the compensation for injury to feelings;c. £3,616.08 compensation for loss of earnings;d. £1,256.85 compensation for accrued holiday pay;e. £684.80 interest on compensation for financial losses.[2]The recoupment provisions do not apply in this case.[3]The claimant’s application for costs or a preparation time order is refused.