Mr N Gull v Satishouse LLP: 3322373/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 The Claimant’s claim against the Respondent for Unfair Dismissal is dismissed as the Claimant has insufficient qualifying service under S108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring such a claim. The claim of holiday pay remains to be determined. Employment Judge Postle ____________________________ Date: 02/09/2020[2]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON …………02/09/2020………………………… AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER ………S.Kent………………………………… FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No:3322373/2019 September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr N Gull Respondent: Satishouse LLP[4]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 The Claimant’s claim against the Respondent for Unfair Dismissal is dismissed as the Claimant has insufficient qualifying service under S108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring such a claim. The claim of holiday pay remains to be determined. Employment Judge Postle ____________________________ Date: 02/09/2020[5]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON …………02/09/2020………………………… AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER ………S.Kent………………………………… FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE[6]Case Number: 3322373/2019 (V) 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr N Gull v Satishouse LLP Heard at: Watford (by video - CVP) On: 11 November 2020 Before: Employment Judge Bloch QC Appearances For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Did not appear The present hearing by video (CVP) was directed by the tribunal in accordance with the current guidance in reponse to the Covid-10 pandemoc[8]The claimant is awarded the sum of £727.82 in respect of an unauthorised deduction contrary to s.13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and/or as a contractual sum owed as follows: 88.65 hours in respect of hours worked but not paid from 5 May 2019 until 28 June 2019 at the hourly rate of £8.21 = £727.82