Mr D M Kropidlowski v Panoramic Doors (UK) Ltd: 3321239/2021
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the South-East Employment Tribunals on 11th October 2021. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]Judgement has been entered in favour of the claimant with sums to be assessed at a remedy hearing.[3]The claimant is to prepare a witness statement setting out all losses claimed including wages owed and for what period of time and must bring 3 copies to the hearing.[4]The claimant is to prepare a bundle containing all documents related to financial losses including wage slips and to bring 3 copies to the hearing. _____________________________ Employment Judge Brown Date: 30/10/2024[1]This Hearing was listed to determine the remedy to which the claimant was entitled pursuant to the default judgment of the 30 October 2024. The claimant did not attend this Hearing.[3]The claim is dismissed due to the non-attendance of the claimant to provide evidence of the amounts claimed.[4]It appears from correspondence on the tribunal file that the correct name of the employer respondent is Panoramic Doors (UK) Limited and the name of the respondent is amended accordingly. Case Number: 3321239/2021 2[5]The respondent was dissolved on the 2 May 2024. The claimant has not successfully applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies. The claim would therefore have been struck out in any event. Approved by: