Mr P Drewniak v Futturo Ltd: 3320184/2019
JUDGMENT
There was no agreement between the parties settling the claim. The respondent offered to pay £2,500 subject to a competed COT3; the claimant counter-offered that the sum of £2,500 should be paid in 7 days and that the respondent should provide a reference. There was no agreement to pay the said sum in 7 days nor that a reference would be provided. Consequently, there was not COT3 signed by the parties. __________________________ Employment Judge Bedeau 24 August 2020 …………………………………….. Sent to the parties on: .……….16/9/2020……. For the Tribunal: ……………..…………………….. Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the judgment. Case Number: 3320184/2019 (V) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr P Drewniak v Futturo Limited Heard at: Watford (by CVP) On: 12 January & 11 June 2021 Before: Employment Judge Cowen Appearances For the Claimant: Mr Soszynski (paralegal) For the Respondent: Mr Hendley (consultant) JUDGMENT This has been a remote video hearing which was attended by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all the issues could be determined in a remote hearing. After hearing submissions, the Tribunal concluded[1]For the reasons given in the oral judgment at the remote hearing, the claimant’s claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed. _