Mr B Kneblewski and Mrs A MacKiewicz v Better Bathrooms Ltd (in administration): 3318751/2019 and 3319923/2019
JUDGMENT
Corrected under the slip rule Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 The following judgment is made against the respondent under Rule 21, the respondent having failed to file a response resisting the claims.[1]The first claimant’s claim for a protective award pursuant to the Trade Union & Labour Relations Act 1992 is well founded. The respondent is ordered to pay the first claimant the sum of £6,000 by way of a protective award for the 13 week period to 1 March 2019 at the rate of £461.53 per week.[2]The first claimant’s claim for damages pursuant to the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 arising from the respondent’s failure to give notice of termination in breach of contract, is well founded. The respondent is ordered to pay the first claimant the sum of £1,202.97 by way of damages for breach of contract.[3]The second claimant’s claim for a protective award pursuant to the Trade Union & Labour Relations Act 1992 and her claim for damages in respect of notice pay pursuant to the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 were presented out of time. Accordingly, the Employment Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to entertain both of her claims and they are dismissed.