Mr E Pishdad v SMJ Holdings Ltd: 3316118/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal is dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.[2]The claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages is dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. _____________________________ Employment Judge Loy 24/07/2020 Date: ………………………………….. 19.08.2020 Sent to the parties on: ....................... ............................................................ For the Tribunal Office . Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case No: 3316118/2019 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ehsan Pishdad Respondent: SMJ Holdings Ltd Heard at: Watford (via CVP) On: 6 April 2021 Before: Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mrs Kay Entwhistle COVID-19 Statement on behalf of Sir Keith Lindblom, Senior President of Tribunals “This has been a remote hearing which has not been objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was V (a video hearing by Cloud Video Platform). A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and no-one requested the same.[1]The Claimant’s claim for holiday pay is well-founded;[2]The Claimant’s claim for breach of contract/notice pay is well-founded;[3]The Respondent is ordered to pay the following sums:a. Sum for holiday pay: £250.92;b. Damages for breach of contract: £139.40.[4]The sums at paragraph 3 are both gross sums (the total being £392.32). Any liability for tax on those figures will be the responsibility of the Claimant.