Mr C Quinn v Providor Ltd: 3315466/2020
JUDGMENT
Judge F Eccles Respondent Claimant 2013 on the 1 of the Judge assertion that The claimant was therefore ordered to pay a deposit of £250 as a condition of being the claimant to make payment of the deposit by no later than two months from the On 7 January 2022 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 21 January 2022, or to request a hearing, in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that it has no should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out Meiklejohn made a Deposit Order under rule 39 of the Employment Tribunal The claimant failed to pay the deposit order and his assertion that his dismissal The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment On 6 October 2022, the Tribunal issued the Deposit Order requiring of success. 2021, Employment reasonable prospects of success in the absence of that assertion. Rules of Procedure. The judge considered that the claimants prospect was unfair was struck out in accordance with rule 39(4). on 6 September was unfair had little reasonable REASONS allowed to continue to advance that assertion. hearing Date of Judgment: 09 February 2022 Entered in register: 09 February 2022