Mrs R Vierra v Pinford End Nursing Home: 3315354/2023

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3315354/2023
Between
Mrs R VierraClaimantPinford End Nursing Home CORRECTED JUDGMENT 1. The claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 30 January 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. 2. The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £1812.24 gross. 3. The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £2416.32 4. The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £15,432 . 5. The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £1875.60. 6. The respondent must pay the claimant £21,536.16 in total.Respondent
Before
Employment Judge GrahamDate 23 December 2024

JUDGMENT

[1]The claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 30 January 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £1812.24 gross.[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £2416.32[4]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £15,432.[5]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £1875.60.[6]The respondent must pay the claimant £21,536.16 in total. CORRECTED REASONS 1. Paragraph 4 of the judgment dated 23 December 2024 contained an error in the calculation of the redundancy payment which has been corrected in this judgment. As a result, the total amount payable to the Claimant at paragraph 6 has been corrected. The calculation at paragraph 4 is as follows: 1.1 16 years’ service x £643 per week (capped) x 1.5 = £15,432 Approved by: CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Under Rule 67, the judgment sent to the parties on 28 January 2025 is corrected as set out in bold font at paragraphs 4 and 6 of the corrected judgment. Approved by: Employment Judge Graham Date 25 February 2025 ...3/3/2025...... ...... Important note to the Claimant(s) and Respondent(s): Any dates for asking for written reasons, applying for reconsideration or appealing against the judgment are not changed by this certificate of correction and corrected judgment. These time limits still run from the date the original judgment or reasons were sent, as explained in the letter that sent the original judgment.