Ms S Bull and Others v Norfolk Feather Company Ltd (in administration): 3315244/2022 and Others (see schedule attached)
JUDGMENT
[1]The Tribunal grants a declaration that the Claimant’s complaint that the Respondent failed to comply with a requirement of Section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 is well founded.[2]The Tribunal finds that there should be a protective award paid to the affected employees at all affected sites of the Respondent, who were dismissed as redundant in May and June 2013.[3]The award shall be in respect of the protected period which begins with the date of the Claimants dismissal, for a period of 90 days.[4]The Claimants are to be paid remuneration for the period of 90 days pursuant to section 190(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.[5]The Claimants are awarded 90 days’ pay per affected employee. _____________________________ Employment Judge Postle Date: 21 February 2023 Header (case numbers) Paragraph 2[3]Multiple Schedule (final entry) _____________________________ Employment Judge Postle Date14 March 2023 SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 21 March 2023 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Important note to parties: Any dates for the filing of appeals or reviews are not changed by this certificate of correction and corrected judgment. These time limits still run from the date of the original judgment, or original judgment with reasons, when appealing. Case Number: 3315244/2022-3315270/2022 & 3314823/2022 Multiple Schedule 3300773 - Norfolk Feather Company Ltd Case Number Case Name 3315244/2022 Ms Sally Bull -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315245/2022 Ms Angela Fox -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315246/2022 Mr Stanley Chambers -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315247/2022 Ms Beth Harrowven -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315248/2022 Ms Tanya Gialanze -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315249/2022 Ms Agnieszka Jasinska -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315250/2022 Ms Julie Hook -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315251/2022 Ms Emma Longford -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315252/2022 Ms Jesse Johnson -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315253/2022 Ms Karen Broughton -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315254/2022 Mr Mark Banham -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315255/2022 Ms Mary Sanford -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315256/2022 Ms Sonia Longford -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315257/2022 Mr Shane Tatum -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315258/2022 Ms Vicky Seeley -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315259/2022 Ms Alexandra Whelan -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315260/2022 Ms Shona Marie Wenden -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315261/2022 Ms Daisy Coomber -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315262/2022 Ms Tzigane Woolner -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315263/2022 Mr Tim Mckeogh -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315264/2022 Ms Debbie Renton -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315265/2022 Mr Nicholas Hensley -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315266/2022 Mr Jake Mills -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315267/2022 Mr Simon Burrage -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315268/2022 Mr Russell Parsons -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315269/2022 Ms Michelle Bunting -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3315270/2022 Ms Donna Blackburn -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others 3314823/2022 Mr Peter Batram -V- Norfolk Feather Company Ltd & Others Case Number: 3315244/2022-3315270/2022 & 3314823/2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms S Bull & others (see schedule attached) Respondent: Norfolk Feather company Ltd (In administration) CORRECTED JUDGMENT[1]The Tribunal grants a declaration that the Claimant’s complaint that the Respondent failed to comply with a requirement of Section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 is well founded.[2]The Tribunal finds that there should be a protective award paid to the affected employees at all affected sites of the Respondent, who were dismissed as redundant in October 2022.[3]The award shall be in respect of the protected period which begins with the date of the Claimants dismissal, for a period of 90 days.[4]The Claimants are to be paid remuneration for the period of 90 days pursuant to section 190(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.[5]The Claimants are awarded 90 days’ pay per affected employee.