Mr R Nicholson v DHL Services Ltd and Wincanton: 3315223/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant was an employee of Wincanton (R2) and not an employee of DHL Services Limited (R1) at the relevant time. The complaint of Unfair Dismissal is therefore dismissed against R1 because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine it. The complaint of unfair dismissal proceeds against R2.[2]All acts of discrimination (failure to make reasonable adjustments) alleged by the claimant occurred during his employment with R2. The claimant was not employed by R1 at the relevant time. The complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments are therefore dismissed against R1 because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine these complaints against R1. The complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments proceed against R2.[3]All acts of victimisation alleged by the claimant occurred during his employment with R2. The claimant was not employed by R1 at the relevant time. The complaints of victimisation are therefore dismissed against R1 because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine these complaints against R1. The complaints of victimisation proceed against R2. Case Number: 3315223/2023[4]All complaints brought by the claimant against R1 are therefore dismissed against R1 because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine these complaints. All complaints brought by the claimant against R1 now proceed against R2.