Mr S Hunt v Amberstone Security Ltd: 3314890/2020
JUDGMENT
[2]The Claimant’s claim for age discrimination is not well founded and is dismissed. _____________________________ Employment Judge King Date: ………………26.09.22……….. Sent to the parties on: 6/10/2022 N Gotecha For the Tribunal Office Case Number: 3314890/2020 2 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case Number: 3314890/2020 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr Steven Hunt v Amberstone Security Limited Heard at: Bury St Edmunds Employment Tribunal (via CVP) On: 13th December 2022 Before: Employment Judge King Members: Mr G Page Mrs A Bray Appearances For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Mr Feeny (counsel)[1]Having previously found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, the Respondent do pay the Claimant the following in respect of that claim: Basic award £2,826.90 Compensatory award Losses from 03.09.20 to 29.10.20 £2,895.92 Pension loss for the same period £ 84.32 Total award £5,807.14 .[2]The Claimant do pay the Respondent’s costs under Rule 37(1)(b) ET Rules and Procedure in the sum of £1,796.26.[3]The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance & Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply and attention is drawn to both the following paragraph and the Annex to this judgment.[4]The total monetary award made to the Claimant is £5,807.14. The prescribed element is £2,895.92. The dates of the period to which the Case Number: 3314890/2020 2 prescribed element is attributable are 3rd September 2020 to 29th October 2020. The total monetary award exceeds the prescribed element by £2,911.22.[5]Any interest order in respect of the judgment dated 13th December 2022 is set aside in the interests of justice.